Temporal Charges to ASAC for October, edited after Board Telecon 09/06/12

1. Report on science results so far and lay the groundwork for future
quantitative analysis.
Highlight some outstanding science results from SV or Cycle 0
and put them in context of the fields they apply to.
Assess what quantitative metrics will be available for assessing
scientific impact by finding out what
statistics are collected by the various Executives. Comment on 
whether the intersection of those sets provides sufficient information
for the ASAC to evaluate quantitative measures of scientific outcomes 
from ALMA.

2. Review the goals of Science Demonstration as part of, or as a
complement to, Science Verification. Should the current goal of 
Science Demonstration (Getting cutting-edge ALMA data
out to the public) be modified, modulated, or limited now that proposals
with proprietary time are being executed and the archive is about to open?
How should targets for SV be chosen, announced, and publicized?
If the goal is to get some ALMA data out to the public, have SV
projects covered the proper spectrum of science areas?

3. How can we help those making ALMA work (JAO staff, postdocs,
fellows, etc.) get some benefit for their own science?