Scientific Reviews
NRAO Interactive Services Modification Request 5 T1 2010
1. Introduction
Complete and test review process and release for outside scientific reviews.
2. Background
3. Requirements
- Reviewers must be able to only see this cycle's proposals, so "options" on left-hand side should probably be removed for reviewing page.
- Make Time Recommended and Rating floats.
- Can we check reviewers against authors at the time of assigning reviewers to proposals ? Obviously reviewers shouldn't be reviewing any proposals on which they are an author.
- Proposals which don't come through the PST, i.e. Global Proposals which come through Northstar, or latex proposal tools. We'd like to have a way that they can get reviewed through the tool. Here is a "minimal" suggestion from Barry:
- Allow proposal managers to create a proposal with status 'EXTERNAL' and let them set prop_id and legacy_id.
- If easy, let them also fill in authors and sources.
- Let them upload a pdf which is the entire proposal as printed from Northstar or latex proposal tools.
- This would also need to have referee information (such as category assignment) just like 'SUBMITTED' proposals.
4. Design
Technical lead should provide a brief description of how this will be implemented in the code.
5. Deployment Checklist
Documentation? Systems/hardware/networking things needed for deployment?
6. Test Plan
6.1 Internal Testing
6.3 Integration/Regression Tests
Signatures
APPROVED: I acknowledge that my request is fully contained in this MR, and if the Open Sky (or other NIS or PST developers) deliver exactly what I specified, I will be happy.
ACCEPTED: I acknowledge that I have validated the completed code according to the acceptance tests, and I am happy with the results.
Written |
- - - - - |
Checked |
- - - - - |
Approved by Scientific Sponsor |
- - - - - |
Accepted/Delivered by Sponsor |
- - - - - |
Symbols:
- Use
%X%
if MR is not complete (will display )
- Use
%Y%
if MR iscomplete (will display )
Discussion Area
--
DanaBalser - 2010-02-27