Reveiw
NRAO Interactive Services Modification Request 3 S3 2012
1. Introduction
These are changes to the review process.
2. Background
3. Requirements
These items are for the 12B review and should be tested after the SRP reviews have been submitted (21 March).
- TAC Page Science Category: During the review process NRAO, in some cases, alters the science category for a proposal. This NRAO-vetted science category should be displayed on the TAC summary page.
- TAC Page and Conflicts:
- We want to change the conflict constraints for the TAC page. Conflicts will only include self-declared conflicts and conflicts where the reviewer is an author on the proposal. So institutional conflicts should not be used here.
- There should not be any lock-out of proposals. That is, even if a reviewer is conflicted they should be allowed to access the proposal.
- There were some conflict errors detected during the TAC meeting. Towards the end of the TAC meeting no reviewer could access proposals. MarkClaussen will provide some information to OpenSky.
4. Design
Technical lead should provide a brief description of how this will be implemented in the code.
5. Deployment Checklist
Documentation? Systems/hardware/networking things needed for deployment?
6. Test Plan
6.1 Internal Testing
6.3 Integration/Regression Tests
Signatures
APPROVED: I acknowledge that my request is fully contained in this MR, and if the Open Sky (or other NIS or PST developers) deliver exactly what I specified, I will be happy.
ACCEPTED: I acknowledge that I have validated the completed code according to the acceptance tests, and I am happy with the results.
Written |
- - - - - |
Checked |
- - - - - |
Approved by Scientific Sponsor |
- - - - - |
Accepted/Delivered by Sponsor |
- - - - - |
Symbols:
- Use
%X%
if MR is not complete (will display )
- Use
%Y%
if MR iscomplete (will display )
Discussion Area
--
DanaBalser - 2012-03-26