Reveiw

NRAO Interactive Services Modification Request 3 S2 2012

---

---

1. Introduction

These are changes to the review process.

2. Background

3. Requirements

• TAC Page Science Category: During the review process NRAO, in some cases, alters the science category for a proposal. This NRAO-vetted science category should be displayed on the TAC summary page.
• TAC Page and Conflicts:
  • We want to change the conflict constraints for the TAC page. Conflicts will only include self-declared conflicts and conflicts where the reviewer is an author on the proposal. So institutional conflicts should not be used here.
  • There should not be any lock-out of proposals. That is, even if a reviewer is conflicted they should be allowed to access the proposal.
  • There were some conflict errors detected during the TAC meeting. MarkClaussen will provide some examples.
• Submitting Reviews Offline: Explore ways for users to download a review template that can be modified in a standard editor offline, and then uploaded into the PST.
• Notify SRP Chair of Conflict Status: We need a mechanism to notify SRP chairs when a SRP member conflict status has changed. Maybe email alerts when an SRP has defined their conflicts and email alerts when the conflict status has been changed by an administrator. Also, there were some cases where a SRP chair was not automaticlaly given access to a "new arrival" on the Reviews page. This appears to be a bug and should be fixed.

4. Design

Technical lead should provide a brief description of how this will be implemented in the code.

5. Deployment Checklist

Documentation? Systems/hardware/networking things needed for deployment?

6. Test Plan

6.1 Internal Testing

6.2 Sponsor Testing

6.3 Integration/Regression Tests

---

Signatures

APPROVED: I acknowledge that my request is fully contained in this MR, and if the Open Sky (or other NIS or PST developers) deliver exactly what I specified, I will be happy.

ACCEPTED: I acknowledge that I have validated the completed code according to the acceptance tests, and I am happy with the results.

Written	- - - - -
Checked	- - - - -
Approved by Scientific Sponsor	- - - - -
Accepted/Delivered by Sponsor	- - - - -

Symbols:

• Use %X% if MR is not complete (will display )
• Use %Y% if MR iscomplete (will display )

---

Discussion Area

-- DanaBalser - 2011-11-15