Proposal Processing Systgem
NRAO Interactive Services Modification Request 1 S1 2011
1. Introduction
We are moving to a new proposal processing system that involves science review panels (SRP), a common telescope allocation committee (TAC), and semester dealines instead of trimesters.
2. Background
3. Requirements
- PSTreqsv2.doc: Requirements for the PST for the New NRAO Proposal Evaluation and Time Allocation Process.
- Priority
- Most of the heavy lifting in category B is requirements 3.*. All of these must be implemented by Dec 15 with the exception of 3.13.5-7, which are category C. The 3.* requirements can be grouped in a natural way and prioritized:
- 3.1-3.3: SRP membership
- 3.4-3.6: Assign proposals to scientific categories
- 3.12: Identify and resolve conflicts of interest
- 3.7-3.10: Science review management
- 3.13: Proposal scoring and completion
- 3.11: Related proposals
4. Design
Technical lead should provide a brief description of how this will be implemented in the code.
5. Deployment Checklist
Documentation? Systems/hardware/networking things needed for deployment?
6. Test Plan
6.1 Internal Testing
6.3 Integration/Regression Tests
Signatures
APPROVED: I acknowledge that my request is fully contained in this MR, and if the Open Sky (or other NIS or PST developers) deliver exactly what I specified, I will be happy.
ACCEPTED: I acknowledge that I have validated the completed code according to the acceptance tests, and I am happy with the results.
Written |
- - - - - |
Checked |
- - - - - |
Approved by Scientific Sponsor |
- - - - - |
Accepted/Delivered by Sponsor |
- - - - - |
Symbols:
- Use
%X%
if MR is not complete (will display )
- Use
%Y%
if MR iscomplete (will display )
Discussion Area
--
DanaBalser - 2010-10-19